- large number of filings;
- geographic disbursement of parties;
- risk of redundancy and inconsistent filings by different judges, resulting in undue delay and expense;
- increased efficiency by having one judge oversee the issues
- common issues of law and fact, as found by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation; and
- consolidation of the federal court cases by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Usually mass tort status requests are made by plaintiffs' counsel, but the rules permit judges to make requests as well. Since mass tort applications from lawyers typically request a specific venue, plaintiffs lawyers will probably express their preferences in comments to the court. However, the final venue decision will be decided based mainly on caseloads in various venues. The three counties being considered are Atlantic, Bergen and Middlesex.
Public comments on the application for mass tort status will be accepted until December 31, 2009 with a determination expected shortly thereafter.
No comments:
Post a Comment